Search for: All records

ABSTRACT Organisms can react to environmental variation by altering their phenotype, and such phenotypic plasticity is often adaptive. This plasticity contributes to the diversity of phenotypes across the tree of life. Generally, the production of these phenotypes must be preceded by assessment, where the individual acquires information about its environment and phenotype relative to that environment, and then determines if and how to respond with an alternative phenotype. The role of assessment in adaptive plasticity is, therefore, crucial. In this Review, we (1) highlight the need for explicitly considering the role of assessment in plasticity; (2) present two different models for how assessment and the facultative production of phenotypes are related; and (3) describe an overarching framework for how assessment evolves. In doing so, we articulate avenues of future work and suggest that explicitly considering the role of assessment in the evolution of plasticity is key to explaining how and when plasticity occurs. Moreover, we emphasize the need to understand the role of assessment in adaptive versus maladaptive plasticity, which is an issue that will become increasingly important in a rapidly changing world. 

Parental effects are often considered an evolved response, in which parents transmit information about the environment to enhance offspring fitness. However, these effects need not be adaptive. Here, we provide a striking example by presenting evidence that overfeeding of adult Mexican spadefoot toads, Spea multiplicata, is associated with decreased offspring survival. After a temporary change to their standard feeding regimen, S. multiplicata in our captive colony developed a much higher body condition (i.e. body mass for a given body length) than those in the wild. We analysed data from three subsequent experiments and found that although the body condition of a father was positively correlated with tadpole survival, mothers with a higher condition had lower tadpole survival. Our study highlights how obesity can negatively impact future generations via maladaptive maternal effects. Such effects could be especially likely for animals living in variable environments (such as spadefoots) that have evolved ‘thrifty phenotypes’ that make them prone to obesity. Our study also illustrates how husbandry conditions typically regarded as beneficial might be harmful. Given that captive breeding programmes are increasingly used to combat worldwide amphibian declines, these programmes must consider the ecology and evolutionary history of the focal species to minimize any maladaptive parental effects. 

Abstract Parental effects are often considered an evolved response, in which parents transmit information about the environment to enhance offspring fitness. However, these effects need not be adaptive. Here, we provide a striking example by presenting evidence that overfeeding of adult Mexican spadefoot toads, Spea multiplicata, is associated with decreased offspring survival. After a temporary change to their standard feeding regimen, S. multiplicata in our captive colony developed a much higher body condition (i.e. body mass for a given body length) than those in the wild. We analysed data from three subsequent experiments and found that although the body condition of a father was positively correlated with tadpole survival, mothers with a higher condition had lower tadpole survival. Our study highlights how obesity can negatively impact future generations via maladaptive maternal effects. Such effects could be especially likely for animals living in variable environments (such as spadefoots) that have evolved ‘thrifty phenotypes’ that make them prone to obesity. Our study also illustrates how husbandry conditions typically regarded as beneficial might be harmful. Given that captive breeding programmes are increasingly used to combat worldwide amphibian declines, these programmes must consider the ecology and evolutionary history of the focal species to minimize any maladaptive parental effects. 

Mating with another species is often maladaptive because it generally results in no or low-fitness offspring. When hybridization is sufficiently costly, individuals should avoid mating with heterospecifics even if it reduces their ability to mate with high-quality conspecifics that resemble heterospecifics. Here, we used spadefoot toads, Spea multiplicata, to evaluate whether females alter their preferences for conspecific male sexual signals (call rate) depending on heterospecific presence. When presented with conspecific signals against a background including both conspecific and heterospecific signals, females preferred male traits that were most dissimilar to heterospecifics—even though these signals are potentially associated with lower-quality mates. However, when these same females were presented with a background that included only conspecific signals, some females switched their preferences, choosing conspecific signals that were exaggerated and indicative of high-quality conspecific mates. Because only some females switched their preferences between these two chorus treatments, there was no population-level preference for exaggerated conspecific male signals in the absence of heterospecifics. These results show that hybridization risk can alter patterns of mate choice and, consequently, sexual selection on male signals. Moreover, they emphasize that the strength and expression of reproductive barriers between species (such as mate choice) can be context-dependent.